Legal Opinion

Fox v. Alascom, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1986No. S-482PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

This case involves an employee who suffered a mental disability allegedly due to non-traumatic, gradual work-related stress. The Workers’ Compensation Board held that in order to recover benefits in this situation the employee must make a preliminary showing that the on-the-job stress she experienced was greater than the stress which all employees experience. We hold that under the Workers’ Compensation Act the board erred in imposing such a requirement.

FACTS.

Appellant Corazón Fox was hired by ap-pellee Alascom, Inc. in October, 1974, as a Senior Clerk Typist…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Deziel v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. School District No. 1 v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Burgess Construction Co. v. SmallwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Royal State National Insurance v. Labor & Industrial Relations Appeal BoardHawaii Supreme Court · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Fairbanks N. Star Bor. v. Rogers & BablerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Thoeni v. Consumer Electronic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Grainger v. Alaska Workers' Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Tolbert v. Alascom, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Wade v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API