Legal Opinion
Fagras v. Marks
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 2, 1935No. 25328PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
This action was originally commenced before a justice of the peace on verified itemized’ account for money due defendant in error for wages or salary for operating a coffee shop in the St. Nicholas Hotel in Oklahoma City under an alleged verbal contract with plaintiff in error, in which Marks was to receive $20 per week for his services. He alleged he worked 25 weeks, earning a total of $506. Fagras had paid him $147.75 cash, and Marks remitted $152.25 in order to bring his claim in the jurisdiction of the justice of the peace.
The verified itemized account was never denied under oath.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maroney v. TannehillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Simons v. HarberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Price v. PrestonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Hicks v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
3Cited by4 opinions
- Swisher v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Colchensky v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Palmer v. GarvesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Reeves v. LangfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937