Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Langford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 1, 1937No. 26222PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants, as they appeared in the court below, where Langford was plaintiff, and Reeves and the First State Bank & Trust Company, a corporation, of .Hollis, Okla., were defendants.

Defendants first urge that the trial court committed reversible error in refusing to grant a new trial requested on the ground of inability to make and serve a case-made. The motion on this ground was predicated on section 398, O. S. 1931, and subdivision 9 thereof. It is shown that certain motions and other pleadings, together with certain requested instructions,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maly v. LamertonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Thompson v. BurtisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Earley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Combs v. Langston Investment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Dunning v. StudtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Knox v. Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API