Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Garves

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1956No. 1802PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Appellee, to whom we shall refer for convenience as plaintiff, sued defendants for unpaid salary in the amount of $2,-207.16. Defendants in their answer denied the indebtedness in the amount claimed. At trial they endeavored to prove that plaintiff was a partner and that an agreement had been entered into whereby they were to pay $1,000 in full settlement of his claim, of which amount $240 had been paid, leaving a balance of $760. Trial by the court resulted in a finding and judgment for plaintiff for $1,500.

No useful purpose would be served by setting forth the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nolan v. WerthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  2. H. Moffat Co. v. RosascoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Lokey v. MalcomCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Denton v. BrocksmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
  5. Ohio Boulevard Land Corp. v. GreggoryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vicki Bagley Realty, Inc. v. LauferDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Montague v. HendersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. In re Estate of Walker v. StefanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API