Legal Opinion

State v. Ruiz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 1, 2004No. 0011-38666; A114493PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*326LANDAU, J.

Defendant appeals a conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1). He assigns error to the denial of a motion to suppress evidence that was seized from him during what he asserts to have been an unlawful stop. We affirm.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. Portland Police Officer Elaias was on patrol near the bathrooms at Waterfront Park in Portland late in the afternoon in November. The Portland Saturday Market was operating next to the park. Elaias knew from his training and experience that this area had a “bad problem with controlled substances.” He saw…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. MiglavsOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. State v. GilkeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. Soto-NavarroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. State v. BackstrandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. State v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. ProutyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. State v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API