Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 22, 2003No. 9803-32587; A113982PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Defendant appeals from convictions for possession and delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of crack cocaine seized by a police officer during a patdown search of his person after the car in which he was a passenger was stopped. After his motion was denied, he was convicted after a stipulated facts trial. The issue on appeal is whether the search was reasonably necessary to the officer’s safety. We affirm.

On appeal, we take the facts as found by the trial court, so long as they are supported by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. BeaOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. MortonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. MiglavsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. Rodriguez-PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. ZumbrumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API