Iroquois Furnace Co. v. Kimbark
Appellate Court of Illinois
Interlocutory Order Appointing a Receiver.— Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1899.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Sears
delivered the opinion of the court.
Appellee has presented a motion to dismiss this appeal because no appeal was prayed and allowed in the court below. The motion is denied. The order appealed from being an interlocutory order, no order of the court allowing an appeal is made necessary by the provisions of the statute. Commerce Vault v. Hurd, 73 Ill. App. 107; Hartzell v. Warren, 77 Ill. App. 274; Eichenbaum v. The Eichenbaum Co., 78 Ill. App. 610.
The several grounds upon which appellant seeks a reversal of this order are : 1st. That the application for the order was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commerce Vault v. HurdAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898
- Shannon v. HanksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1891
- Miller v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
- Hartzell v. WarrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898
- Benneson v. BillIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maitia v. Allied L. & L. S. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1926
- Sherman v. WichnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Crabbe v. Municipal Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
- Meissler v. MeisslerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
- Kehm v. MottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900