Legal Opinion

Meissler v. Meissler

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 8, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Bill for Belief.—Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward F. Dunne, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1900. Rehearing denied.

Read the full summary

Bill for Belief.—Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward F. Dunne, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1900. Rehearing denied. Statement.—Plaintiff in error filed a bill against defendant in error and Samuel Gliekman, alleging the fraudulent procurement of the execution by complainant and defendant to Gliekman of a quit-claim deed of certain real property described in the bill, and the execution by Gliekman, on the same day, of a conveyance of the premises to the defendant, Naomi Meissler, complainant’s wife. Defendant, Naomi Meissler, answered,…

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justioe Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

The contentions of counsel for plaintiff fn error are, that so much of the decree as reserves a lien to defendant in error is erroneous, and that the appointment of defendant in error receiver, and the allowance to her of $50 per month, are erroneous.

The question as to the lien is not argued by counsel for plaintiff in error, nor is it pointed out in what the error, if any, consists, and therefore the objection might be deemed waived. However, in view of the fact that defendant in error is the owner of an undivided half of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Iroquois Furnace Co. v. KimbarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  2. University of Illinois v. Globe Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Riordan v. HortonWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Meissler v. MeisslerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API