Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Crabbe v. Municipal Savings & Loan Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1924No. 18543PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
Are trustees appointed by the directors of a corporation, pursuant to Section 11972 of the General Code, whose general fitness, integrity, and ability are conceded, eligible to be appointed receivers without the consent of the state in an action brought by the Attorney General for the dissolution of the corporation? This is the controlling question in this case.
On March 10, 1924, Messrs. Baehr, Wilberding, and Cross were appointed by the board of directors of the Municipal Savings & Loan Company as trustees for the company under Section 11972 of the General Code “to exercise the powers…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baker v. Administrator of BackusIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
- Donovan v. CampionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Patterson v. Northern Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Rosina v. TrowbridgeNevada Supreme Court · 1888
- Tatum v. RobertsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alford v. Arbors at Gallipolis, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Gallia County2018
- Layne v. HuffmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Schmidt v. Weather-Seal, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1943
- Pueblo v. Rubert Hermanos, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940
- Corbett v. Warren Peoples Market Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.