Kehm v. Mott
Appellate Court of Illinois
Foreclosure.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elbridge Hanecy, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1899.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Windes
It is claimed by appellants that it was error to appoint Emil E. Haase receiver, because he was a defendant. This contention, we think, is answered by the fact that it is stipulated in the trust deed being foreclosed that he might be appointed receiver; by the further fact that it does not appear from this record that he has any interest whatever unfriendly or inimical to appellants; and for the further reason that under the answer of appellants they deny that they have any interest in the premises. Iroquois Furnace Co. v. Kimbark, 85 Ill. App. 399, and cases there cited.
It is also claimed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sichler v. LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Gage v. PerryIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
- Gray v. RobertsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Hoes v. BoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Iroquois Furnace Co. v. KimbarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.