Legal Opinion

Timothy Rylee v. Sheriff Charles Chapman

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 27, 2009No. 08-15036UnpublishedCited by 33 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-Appellant Timothy Rylee (“Ry-lee”), an individual with a hearing impairment, alleges that his rights were violated by Defendant-Appellees Charles Chapman, Joseph Chapman, Cary Way, Brian Lord, John Doe, and Banks County, Georgia (collectively “Appellees”), throughout the course of his arrest, booking, interrogation, and first appearance hearing. Ry-lee brought claims against Appellees under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12131, et seq., the Rehabilitation Act (“RA”), 29 U.S.C. § 794, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Following discovery, the district court granted…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Todd v. CarstarphenDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
  2. Leme v. Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
  3. Smith v. RaineyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2010
  4. Mattingly v. University of South Florida Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2013
  5. Monaco v. City of JacksonvilleDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2014

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API