Legal Opinion

Mattingly v. University of South Florida Board of Trustees

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided March 15, 2013No. Case No. 8:11-cv-00961-T-27TBMPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES D. WHITTEMORE, District Judge.

BEFORE THE COURT is The Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 21), to which Plaintiff has responded (Dkt. 31). Upon consideration, the motion (Dkt. 21) is GRANTED.

I. Factual Background 1

On April 18, 2008, Kenton Mattingly was hired by the University of South Florida Tampa Police Department as a law enforcement officer (Dkt. 1 ¶ 8). USF requires all of its officers to work rotating twelve-hour shifts and to complete a mandatory, sixteen-week field training program (Dkt. 26 at 59:1-60:13; Dkt. 28 ¶ 5; Dkt. 24 at 10:5-8). Even individuals with…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. Univ. Hosp. Health Sys., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Hawthorne v. City of Prattville, AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020
  3. Kingsolver v. GarlandDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2024
  4. Patton v. Forest River IncDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API