Kranich & Bach v. Lobell
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
This case was on the April, 1923, calendar of the circuit court for Muskegon county. As we understand the record it had been set for trial before the court without a jury. On April 24th application for a continuance was submitted by defendant. It was in the usual form of a first application for continuance and was based on the inability to procure the testimony of two material witnesses residing in Chicago. An order was entered granting the continuance without specifying the term or time to which the case was continued. On July 5th defendant’s counsel were notified that the case was again set…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. EamausMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Conger v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Ward v. CareyMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- McNaughton v. EvertMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Winklemeir v. DaiberMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bauman v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. DonovanMichigan Supreme Court · 1924