Legal Opinion

Winklemeir v. Daiber

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The-facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This was assumpsit upon a contract for building two cottages, the balance claimed to be ■ due being $125, for which amount plaintiff had judgment.

Plaintiff claimed that the work tvas done upon a contract for a specific amount for each of the two,houses, and defendant denied any such contract, and insisted that plaintiff was to receive a given amount per day for his work. Exceptions were taken to the charge of the court and to the refusal to give certain requests. The court submitted the issue to the jury fairly and properly, and it is not necessary to discuss either the instructions given or…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Geddis v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. McLay v. McLayMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Christophersen v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Kranich & Bach v. LobellMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. DonovanMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API