Ward v. Carey
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham; Collingwood, J. Case by Frank Ward, Harry Scarlett and Albert Scarlett, copartners as Ward, Scarletts & Co., against James J. Carey for the conversion of an automobile. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
January 4, 1916, John A. Hicks and Charles Dunn were operating a garage and Oakland sales agency on Michigan avenue east, in the city of Lansing. It was known as the Central Garage. At the same time plaintiffs were operating a garage at North Lansing and were handling the Chevrolet cars. On the evening in question the parties, having previously had some negotiations, got together at plaintiffs’ office in North Lansing, and finally agreed upon the terms of a sale of the Central Garage to plaintiffs for the sum of $1,400. Fifty dollars was paid on the purchase price and a receipt given…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mahiat v. CoddeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Nissly v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Smith v. Michigan Realty & Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Selling v. BergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tishhouse v. SchoenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Farm Products Co. v. JordanMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Ames v. MacPhailMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Frank v. McLain (In Re Peet Packing Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Maki v. School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.