Conger v. Hall
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Berrien; Coolidge, J. Assumpsit by Emma Conger against Charles W. Hall for work and labor. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff claims to have been defendant’s housekeeper for a period of nine years, or thereabouts, at his request, and brought this action to recover the value of such service. She recovered a judgment, which, on motion for new trial, was reduced to $2,700, as a condition for the denial of that motion. The defendant has brought the cause to this court by writ of error.
The defense made was that the defendant was a boarder at an agreed price of $4 per week, at the plaintiff’s home, which for a portion of the time she is alleged to have rented of defendant at an agreed price of $7 per month,…
2Cited by11 opinions
- People v. AuerbachMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. SartoriMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Hollister v. Kinyon's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Hotchkiss v. Weinmann-Matthews Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Swan v. GregoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.