Legal Opinion
Valdivia v. Schwarzenegger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 25, 2010No. Nos. 08-15889, 09-15836PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge HAWKINS; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge NOONAN.
HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
These consolidated appeals stem from the November 2003 Valdivia Permanent Injunction (“the Injunction”) — based on a stipulation between Jerry Valdivia (“Valdivia”) and a class of similarly situated California parolees1 (“Plaintiffs”), and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and the State of California (collectively “the State”)— prescribing procedures for parole revocation hearings in California. Here, the State appeals two post-injunction orders: (1) the March 25, 2008 order (“March 2008…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Halray Harman v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- John Draper v. D. RosarioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Grove v. Wells Fargo Financial California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Melissia Henson v. Fidelity National FinancialCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Curtis v. ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- People v. DeLeonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.