Legal Opinion
Curtis v. Chester
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 24, 2010No. 09-3338PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.
Bruce Alan Curtis, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 to challenge the United States Parole Commission’s decision to revoke his parole and set an above-guidelines reconsideration date of 15 years. 1 He argues the parole board violated his Sixth Amendment right to confront adverse witnesses and also engaged in impermissible “double counting” to arrive at the reconsideration date. The district court found these claims to be groundless and denied his petition.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. After a…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Luster v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Leatherwood v. AllbaughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. RubyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. DoswellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.