Legal Opinion

Grove v. Wells Fargo Financial California, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 20, 2010No. 08-56964PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:

Kenneth Grove appeals the district court’s award of attorney’s fees and costs following the settlement of his Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) action against Wells Fargo Financial California, Inc. (“Wells Fargo”). The principle issue before us is whether the expense-shifting provision in the FCRA authorizes district courts to award costs that otherwise would be non-taxable under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, which generally authorizes the award of certain specified costs. Because we conclude that it does, we reverse the district court on this issue, but affirm on Grove’s other…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Tri-Valley Cares v. U.S. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Secalt S.A. v. Wuxi Shenxi Construction MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. In re Taco Bell Wage & Hour ActionsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
  4. Rodriguez v. Barrita, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. Pierce v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API