Legal Opinion

People v. DeLeon

California Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2017No. S230906PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

*644 Under Morrissey v. Brewer (1972) 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 ( Morrissey ), parolees facing revocation are constitutionally entitled to certain due process protections. These include the right to a prompt preliminary hearing after arrest to determine whether there is probable cause to believe a parole violation has occurred. ( Id . at pp. 485-487, 92 S.Ct. 2593 .) The Criminal Justice Realignment Act of 2011 (the Realignment Act) transferred jurisdiction over most parole revocation hearings from the Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) to the superior **16 courts. The question…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Richard Benson v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. People v. Johnson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. People v. Murdock, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. People v. Wiley, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API