Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Bayer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1922PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, C. J.

In several causes of action, one in his own right and the remainder as assignee of other parties, the plaintiff joins as defendants the Eastern Irrigation, Power & Lumber Company, a corporation, J. C. Bayer, its trustee, and Joseph R. Keep, and as to the action in his own right alleges:

“That between the twenty-seventh day of April and the sixteenth day of August, 1918, this plaintiff, at the special instance and request of defendants, performed labor, advanced money, furnished goods, wares and merchandise, and furnished a gasoline motor-truck for defendants in hauling machinery, a large steam…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Southern Pac. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Tot v. GongOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Whitten v. GriswoldOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Frank v. WoodcockOregon Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. WOLFE INVESTMENTS, INC. v. ShroyerOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Associated Oil Co. v. La BranchOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Bell v. Hanover Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Scholz Homes, Inc. v. Lavern E. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  5. State ex rel. Spitzer v. BeveridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API