Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Bierwerth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 20, 1970No. 41741, 41817PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant, St. Paul Fire and Mariné Insurance Company, brought this action for a declaratory judgment against defendants-respondents, Robert Bierwerth, Robert Dwayne Stroschein, Jr., and Douglas Michael Paulus, to establish the respective rights and liabilities of the parties with respect to a contract of automobile liability insurance.

The trial court ruled that the contract of insurance under which plaintiff insured, defendant Paulus was in effect January 15, 1966, and that plaintiff has the duty of defending Paulus in legal actions arising out of an accident which…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Seavey Ex Rel. Ellis v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Hamm Realty Co. v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Cormican v. Anchor Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Nehring v. BastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Charlie Craig v. Bemis Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. AMCO Insurance Co. v. LangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  4. Gresser v. HotzlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Royal Insurance Co. v. Western Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API