Legal Opinion

Gresser v. Hotzler

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 4, 2000No. C0-99-1078PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Michael Gresser sued Calvin and Cheryl Hotzler for specific performance of a purchase agreement for commercial real estate and, alternatively, for breach of contract. On the Hotzlers’ motion for partial summary judgment on Gresser’s specific-performance claim, the district court held that the purchase agreement was invalid and entered final judgment against Gres-ser pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. P. 54.02, dismissing both the specific-performance and breach-of-contract claims. Gresser appeals from the judgment.

FACTS

The property in dispute includes five acres of land and a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Transamerica Insurance Group v. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Hoyt R. Matise Company v. Stanley ZurnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Graphic Communications International Union Upper Midwest Local 1M Health & Welfare Plan v. BjorkedalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Commercial Associates, Inc. v. Work Connection, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  4. ACUITY v. Bryan C. Johnson, etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  5. Cisneros v. GrahamNebraska Supreme Court · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API