Hamm Realty Co. v. New Hampshire Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for Ramsey county to recover |1,-513.45 on a fire insurance policy. The case was tried before Kelly, J., who at the close of plaintiff’s testimony granted defendant’s motion for a dismissal of the action. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
This is an action brought to recover on a policy of insurance is*140sued by defendant company. The controversy arose over the question whether, under the evidence, the policy in question had been substituted for that of another company, and accepted by the insured, before the loss occurred. By agreement the action was tried to the court. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence it was dismissed, upon motion of defendant, without findings of law or fact. A motion for. a new trial was denied, and from the order denying the same plaintiff appeals to this court.
Under the proceedings in this case, we…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dibble v. Northern Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
- M. Arnfeld & Son v. Guardian Assurance Co. of LondonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Stone v. Franklin Fire Insurance Co. of BostonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Buick v. Mechanics' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Herrick v. BarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Homer v. LesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Sterling Fire Insurance v. Comision Reguladora Del Mercado De HenequenIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
- Bank of Anderson v. Home InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Warren v. Franklin Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Allemania Fire Insurance v. ZwengSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.