Legal Opinion

Mackay v. Peterson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1922No. 17336PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

-Respondents, as plaintiffs, alleging that the transaction was induced by false representations upon which they relied, sought by this action to recover damages therefor in the amount of $2,500. Prom a judgment against the defendants awarding such damages to the extent of $1,250 and interest, this appeal is prosecuted.

The facts, except as to whether or not such representations were made, are not greatly in dispute. It appears that in November, 1919, respondents were the owners of three pieces of residence property in the city of Seattle, which they valued at $8,500, subject to mortgages…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wooddy v. Benton Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Conta v. CorgiatWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Wilson v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Van Horn v. O'ConnorWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. George v. KurdyWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rummer v. ThroopWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Lou v. Bethany Lutheran Church of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Marion v. Grand Coulee Dam HotelWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Rackham v. KochWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Forsyth v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API