Legal Opinion
Foster v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 21, 1992No. 28/71 1989; 15/90; 16/90; 17/90; 18/90; 19/90; 20/90; 21/90; 22/90; 23/90; 24/90; J-108-1990PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court modifying, and then approving, a Rehabilitation Plan (“Plan”) for Mutual Fire, Marine and Inland Insurance Company (“Mutual Fire”) submitted by Appellee, Constance Foster, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (“Commissioner or Rehabilitator”), pursuant to Section 515(a) of Article V of the Act of May 17, 1921, P.L. 789, as amended, by the Act of December 14, 1977, P.L. 280, 40 P.S. § 221.15 (known as the Insurance Department Act of 1921). While numerous Appellants challenge the Plan on…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Blumenschein v. Pittsburgh Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- American Iron & Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Warrantech Consumer Products Services, Inc. v. Reliance Insurance Co. in LiquidationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Commonwealth, Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Superior Precast, Inc. v. Safeco Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Prudential Reinsurance Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.