Legal Opinion
United States v. Sarkisian
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 3, 1999No. Nos. 98-10241, 98-10242, 98-10250, 98-10261PublishedCited by 155 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Ashot Mikayelyan, Vitaly Semenev, Vasak Sarkisian, and Sergey Ivanchikov appeal their trial convictions and sentences imposed for numerous counts of trafficking in altered motor vehicle parts and one count of conspiracy to violate the Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 511-511A, 42 U.S.C. § 14171. Mikayelyan appeals his conviction and sentence imposed for one count of collection of an extension of credit by extortionate means, and Semenov appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for acquittal on that charge.
We have jurisdiction pursuant…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by155 opinions
- Stanley Williams v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, California State Prison, San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- United States v. Kendrick WeatherspoonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Francisco Jimenez Recio, United States of America v. Adrian Lopez-MezaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. HermanekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.