Legal Opinion

United States v. Bornfield

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1998No. 97-2169PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge.

Mikel Bornfield (Bornfield) appeals from his conviction and sentence following a jury tidal wherein he was found guilty of engaging in a monetary transaction in criminally derived property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1957(a).

Background

Bornfield is a certified public accountant in Albuquerque, New Mexico. In the late 1980s, he prepared tax returns for Sidney and Laurenda Terrell (the Terrells) and Richard Gonzagowski (Gonzagowski). During this time, Sidney Terrell (Terrell) owned a variety of fledgling businesses and Gonza-gowski was self-employed in the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. SaccocciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. United States v. McVeighCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. John Robert Hasson, A.K.A. Heloneti Galera, A.K.A. Jack HassonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Yeley-DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. SeherCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API