Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph A. Kirschenbaum, A/K/A Ari Kirschenbaum, Appeal Of: Julie Kirschenbaum
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 23, 1998No. 98-1591, 98-1592PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
For those terminally ill, Medicare and Medicaid will pay for hospice care, which treats the patient with pain control and additional medical, social and spiritual assistance for the patient and the family. Defendant Joseph Ari Kirschenbaum owned or controlled a number of entities that delivered hospice services, and over several years he and his business operations received many millions of dollars. But the government has charged him with fraud and money laundering, and, pending trial, has seized about $20 million in assets. Mr. Kirschenbaum brings this interlocutory…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- United States v. KaleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. J. Richard JamiesonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Whitesel v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- In Re: Rimsat, Limited, Debtor, Appeals Of: Kauthar Sdn BhdCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- First National Bank of Chicago, F/k/a Nbd Bank, Cross-Appellee v. Standard Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.