Legal Opinion

D.H. Blattner & Sons, Inc. v. N.M. Rothschild & Sons, Ltd.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2002No. S-9729, S-9749PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

At issue in this appeal are a series of claims by two creditors regarding their entitlement to the liquidated assets of a defunct gold and silver mine in western Alaska. After the mining operation failed, both D.H. Blattner & Sons, Inc. and N.M. Rothschild & Sons, Ltd. brought separate lien enforcement and foreclosure actions in the superior court. In eross-motions for summary judgment, each party claimed that its own liens are valid and have priority. The superior court ruled that to the extent that Blattner's liens are valid, they have priority over…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Mining Co. v. CullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Wettanen v. CowperAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Progressive Insurance Co. v. SimmonsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rausch v. DevineAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Kodiak Island Borough v. MahoneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Laidlaw Transit, Inc. v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Titus v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. McLaren v. McLarenAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API