Legal Opinion

Terumo Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided February 21, 1986No. Court No. 84-8-01089Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion and Order

DiCarlo, Judge:

Plaintiff challenges the United States Customs Service (Customs) classification of merchandise invoiced as "Clirans Hollow Fiber Dialyzers” under item 709.17 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) as "Electro-medical apparatus, and parts thereof: * * * Other.” Plaintiff claims that the dialyzers are properly classifiable under item 661.95, TSUS, as "filtering and purifying machinery and apparatus * * * for liquids or gases * * * and parts thereof * * * other.”

Defendant moves for summary judgment. The parties agree that the dialyzers are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  2. Certified Blood Donor Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  3. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. S & T Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  5. Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API