Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Global Telecom Services L.L.C.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 19, 2004No. CIV.3:03 CV 418 PCDPublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DORSEY, District Judge.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rule 56(a) Plaintiff moves for summary judgment. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs motion is granted.
I. Background 1
In the early 1990s, the Needlyzer, a device that allegedly safely destroys hypodermic needles, was manufactured. In connection with the device Defendant Medical Disposal Services (“Medical Disposal”) used the slogan “Don’t get stuck with someone else’s problem.” In 1992, Defendant Albert D. LaTouche’s (“La-Touche”) brother Brian LaTouehe contracted with the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. KellyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Mendelsohn v. Jacobowitz (In Re Jacobs)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Miron v. Town of StratfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. LevineDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- In Re Alstom SA Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.