Unnamed Physician v. Commission on Medical Discipline
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.
Murphy, C. J., and Orth, J., concur in part and dissent in part. Murphy, C. J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Orth, J., joins at page 15 infra.
The primary question presented in this case is whether the proceedings, records and files of a medical review committee are protected by statute from the subpoena power of the Commission on Medical Discipline. We shall examine certain sections of the Maryland Code (1957, 1971 Repl. Vol., 1978 Supp.), Article 43, to determine if the legislative intent and answer to this question is manifest.
Section 130A establishes…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. FabritzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Pearson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Police Commissioner v. DowlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Smith v. HiginbothomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Ssih Equipment S.A. v. United States International Trade Commission and Stewart-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Arnett v. Dal CieloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Sigma Reproductive Health Center v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Comptroller of Treasury v. John C. Louis Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. SchlossbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.