Legal Opinion
Smith v. Higinbothom
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided September 3, 1946No. [No. 22, Adv. October Term, 1946.]PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Per curiam
For reasons to be stated in an opinion to be filed hereafter, it is ordered by the Court of Appeals this 19th day of June, 1946, that the order appealed from, refusing a preliminary injunction in the above entitled case, be and the same is hereby affirmed, and that the decree appealed from, sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the bill of complaint, be and the same is hereby affirmed with costs to the appellees.
2Opinion of the CourtDelaplaine, J.
This suit was brought in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City by four members of the Baltimore Bar, Horace T. Smith, Webster C. Tall, James K. Cullen and Wilfred T. McQuaid, seeking a…
3Cases cited43 opinions
- United States v. GillilandSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gooch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. Standard Brewery, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Willis v. MabonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by119 opinions
- Attorney General of Maryland v. WaldronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Amalgamated Casualty Insurance v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Board of Educ., Garrett Co. v. LendoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Pressman v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.