Legal Opinion

State v. Quintero

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 19, 1999No. 97C-20824; CA A100053PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendant was convicted of one count of attempted rape in the first degree, ORS 163.375, and two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427. On appeal, defendant contends that the sentence imposed by the trial court violated the “400 percent rule,” which limits consecutive sentences under the sentencing guidelines, OAR 213-008-0007. The state contends that defendant’s claim of error is unpreserved and unreviewable and, in any event, that the sentence was lawful. We conclude that the sentence was erroneous but, for the reasons that follow, decline to review it. Therefore, we…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. KephartOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. SkeltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. State v. LangdonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. LongeneckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Ward v. RIVER PARKS AUTHORITYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
  5. State v. NOLASCO-LARACourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API