Legal Opinion
Ward v. RIVER PARKS AUTHORITY
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 29, 2010No. 108,348. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH L. BUETTNER, Presiding Judge.
T1 In this Review Proceeding, Petitioner Deborah A. Ward challenges the Workers' Compensation Court's order denying Ward's motion to reopen on a change of condition based on expiration of the statutory time period for reopening a claim. Respondents River Parks Authority and CompSource Oklahoma (collectively, Employer) successfully argued that Ward sought to reopen more than three years after the last order substantially affecting the monetary, medical, or rehabilitative benefits conferrable and, as a result, the Workers' Compensation Court was without…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arrow Tool & Gauge v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Lang v. Erlanger Tubular Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Shell Petroleum Corp. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Gratzer v. Happy FoodsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
- State v. QuinteroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- AMS STAFF LEASING INC. v. THOMPSONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- AMS STAFF LEASING INC. v. THOMPSONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- Ward v. RIVER PARKS AUTHORITYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010