Legal Opinion

McGraw v. Friend & Terry Lumber Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1898No. Sac. No. 268PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento and from an order refusing a new trial. Matt. F. Johnson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, C.

This appeal is by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order denying defendant's motion for a new trial.

The action is for the recovery of damages for personal injuries. A jury trial was had and a verdict returned awarding damages to the plaintiff in the sum of three thousand dollars.

The defendant is the owner of two lots fronting on the north line of J street in the city of Sacramento. These lots are six or seven feet below the grade of the sidewalk, and on them was a shed, the front of which was fifteen or sixteen inches from the inner line of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Stephenson v. S. Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Glascock v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Barry v. TerkildsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Orcutt v. Pacific Coast Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ulmen v. SchwiegerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. County of Alameda v. TieslauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Jacobson v. Oakland Meat & Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Reynolds v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Roseberry v. Edward F. Niehaus & Co.California Supreme Court · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API