Roseberry v. Edward F. Niehaus & Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff was injured by the falling of lumber which had been piled on the premises of defendant. He was awarded damages in the sum of two thousand dollars. The defendant appeals from this judgment and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
The plaintiff was employed as a stationary engineer by Messrs. Poetsch and Peterson, tanners. About the eleventh day of April, 1909, he went with Mr. Poetsch to examine a boiler which the corporation now defendant herein had for sale at its premises. They met Mr. Niehaus, one of the officers of the corporation, and after some talk Mr. Poetsch…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Giraude v. Elec. Improvement Co. of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Davis v. California Street Cable RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Jacobson v. Oakland Meat & Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Brett v. S. H. Frank & Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Reynolds v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- McStay v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Smith v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Meindersee v. MeyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.