Legal Opinion

Glascock v. Central Pacific Railroad

California Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1887No. 11581PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

— Plaintiff is the widow of George Glascock, who was killed by defendant’s cars at a railroad crossing near Black’s Station on the morning of November 1, 1884. The cause came on for trial before a jury, and after the plaintiff had rested her case, a motion for a nonsuit was made and granted.

Counsel for appellant, in the following epitome, give a very fair statement of the facts: —

“ Black’s Station is a village about ten miles northwest from Woodland, in Yolo County. A public road about sixty feet wide leads from Black’s in a southerly direction for about a quarter of a mile; thence easterly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schofield v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Fernandes v. Sacramento City Ry.California Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  4. Flemming v. W. Pac. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Clark v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Holmes v. South Pacific Coast RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Hamlin v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Wheeler v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Everett v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API