Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 2001No. 99-2774PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDiane S. Sykes, J.

¶ 1. The issue in this case is whether an attorney admitted pro hac vice 1 has the right to notice and an opportunity to be heard before his or her pro hac vice admission can be revoked. The issue arose in this medical malpractice action when the circuit court granted a mistrial based upon "reprehensible" pretrial and trial conduct by the plaintiffs' attorney, who was licensed in Illinois but admitted in Wisconsin for purposes of this case. Five days after the mistrial, without notice or hearing, the circuit court sua sponte issued an order withdrawing the attorney's pro hac vice admission.

¶…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. Roy W. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. Labor & Farm Party v. Elections BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Bank of Hawaii v. KunimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Filppula-McArthur v. HalloinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Obert v. Republic Western InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2002
  4. DeBruin v. St. Patrick CongregationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Ford Motor Company v. Donald R. Young, IICourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API