Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bank of Hawaii v. Kunimoto

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1999No. 20575PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

RAMIL, J.

Parties-in-interest/appellants A. Barry Cappello (Cappello) and James L. Hudgens (Hudgens) (collectively appellants), pro hac vice counsel for defendant Allan R. Kunimo-to, M.D. (Dr. Kunimoto) in a mortgage foreclosure action filed by plaintiff-appellee Bank of Hawaii (BOH) on April 23, 1993, appeal from the first circuit court’s order, filed on December 24, 1996, granting BOH’s motion for an order to show cause why Dr. Kunimo-to, Cappello, and Hudgens should not be held in contempt of court. In the December 24, 1996 order, the circuit court revoked the pro hac…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Awakuni v. AwanaHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Save Sunset Beach Coalition v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2003

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API