Legal Opinion · Concurrence

DeBruin v. St. Patrick Congregation

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2012No. 2010AP2705Published

1ConcurrenceN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶ 40. {concurring). This is an employment contract dispute that centers on the contract's termination clause, and it requires the application of well-established contract principles. The analysis in such a case starts with the terms of the contract. The termination clause in this case contains a highly unusual and crucial provision: it states that the employee "shall not be discharged during the term of this contract, without good and sufficient cause, which shall be determined by the [employer]." What is unusual, of course, is that the contract explicitly and by agreement leaves the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Maryland Arms Ltd. Partnership v. ConnellWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Labor & Farm Party v. Elections BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Adams Outdoor Advertising, Ltd. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Coulee Catholic Schools v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Gerruth Realty Co. v. PireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API