Groce v. Foster
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
This certiorari proceeding tenders an issue of first impression — whether, under the limited public-policy exception to the termination-at-will doctrine, first announced in Burk v. K-Mart Corporation,1 a wrongful discharge action will lie against an employer who fires an employee for the latter’s refusal to dismiss his common-law negligence action against a third party, who was a customer of the employer, for redress of on-the-job injuries. We answer in the affirmative.
I
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
Recovery is sought for tortious discharge from employment in violation of this…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Adler v. American Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Brock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Hayes v. Eateries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Darrow v. Integris Health, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.