Legal Opinion

Groce v. Foster

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 28, 1994No. 78068PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

This certiorari proceeding tenders an issue of first impression — whether, under the limited public-policy exception to the termination-at-will doctrine, first announced in Burk v. K-Mart Corporation,1 a wrongful discharge action will lie against an employer who fires an employee for the latter’s refusal to dismiss his common-law negligence action against a third party, who was a customer of the employer, for redress of on-the-job injuries. We answer in the affirmative.

I

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

Recovery is sought for tortious discharge from employment in violation of this…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Adler v. American Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Brock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Hayes v. Eateries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Darrow v. Integris Health, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API