Legal Opinion
Balut v. Loral Electronic Systems
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 17, 1997No. 95 Civ. 4011(WCC)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Ramon Balut brings this action against defendants Loral Electronic Systems (“LES”) and Loral Corporation (“Loral”), alleging defendants terminated his employment on account of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 6É1 et seq.
BACKGROUND
From August 1979 to June 1994, Balut was employed by LES, first as Director of Programs, then as Program Director and ultimately, as Senior Production Program Manager on the company’s ALQ-131 program. LES was one of Loral’s three subsidiaries,…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ramos v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Velez v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Whitehurst v. 230 Fifth, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Herman v. Blockbuster Entertainment GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Meng v. Ipanema Shoe Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.