Legal Opinion

Bryant v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 6, 2005No. PD-672-04PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.

joined by KELLER, P.J., and PRICE, WOMACK, HERVEY, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, JJ.

Before his trial for driving while intoxicated, Clarence Randolph Bryant stipulated to two prior DWI convictions. The State agreed to the stipulation, but the stipulation was not admitted into evidence. On appeal, Bryant argued that the evidence was insufficient to convict because the State failed to offer proof of the stipulated prior convictions. We conclude that Bryant’s stipulation bars him from bringing this claim on appeal.

Procedural History

Bryant was charged by indictment with driving while intoxicated…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Brito Carrasco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. Tamez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Shepherd v. LedfordTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. United States v. MeadeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by117 opinions

  1. Flowers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Bowen, DeborahCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  3. Gipson, Raimond KevonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. Houston v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
  5. in Re Commitment of Lester G. TalleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API