Legal Opinion

State v. Fowler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1974No. 34PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Assignments of error Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7 are not brought forward and argued in defendant’s brief, and consequently these assignments are deemed abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court; State v. Crews, 284 N.C. 427, 201 S.E. 2d 840 (1974) ; State v. McLean, 282 N.C. 147, 191 S.E. 2d 598 (1972). However, in view of the gravity of the punishment in this case, we have carefully reviewed these assignments but find them to be without merit.

By his fourth assignment of error defendant asserts that “[t]he trial court erred in its instructions to the jury in that…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. SkipperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API