Legal Opinion
O'CONNOR v. Boeing North American, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 28, 2000No. CV 97-1554 ABC (RCX)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R.CIV.P. 56
COLLINS, District Judge.
Defendants Boeing North American, Inc. and Rockwell International Corporation filed a motion for summary judgment on December 27, 1999. The motion raises the issue of whether most of Plaintiffs’ claims are barred because Plaintiffs should have known of their claims outside of the applicable limitations period. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties, argument of counsel, and the case file, the Court concludes that, as to 69 Plaintiffs asserting…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Anthony A. Calderone, Clark Hornbaker, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jacobsen v. OliverDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- O'Connor v. Boeing North American, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2000
- Grisham v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Gallardo v. DiCarloDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Medimatch, Inc. v. Lucent Technologies Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.