Legal Opinion
Grisham v. Philip Morris, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 7, 2009No. CV 02-7930 SVW (RCx)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS DEFENSE [160]; (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY CASE PENDING FINAL OUTCOME OF PER CURIUM OPINION AND REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED HEARING [161]; (3) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [174]
STEPHEN V. WILSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The factual and procedural background of this case is set out in the Court’s previous orders. (See October 4, 2007 Order Granting and Partially Denying Defendants’ Motion to Strike and Partially Granting Dismissal, docket no. 108;…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Tobacco Cases ICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Eidson v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- In Re Light Cigarettes Marketing Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. McVay (In re McVay)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.