Gallardo v. DiCarlo
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
PROCEEDINGS: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT LORI DICARLO’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6).
TIMLIN, District Judge.
The court, Judge Robert J. Timlin, has read and considered Warden Lori DiCarlo (“DiCarlo”)’s Motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6) (“Rule 12(b)(6)”); Plaintiff Frank Gallardo (“Gallardo”)’s opposition; and Di-Carlo’s reply. Based on such consideration, the court concludes as follows:
I
BACKGROUND 1
On February 7, 2000, Gallardo, an…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Galbraith v. County of Santa ClaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Galbraith v. County Of Santa ClaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Newman v. San Joaquin Delta Community College DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Grisham v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Kyles v. BakerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.