Medimatch, Inc. v. Lucent Technologies Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART, DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
HENDERSON, District Judge. INTRODUCTION
This is a consumer fraud action brought by plaintiffs MediMateh Corporation and Intrax Corporation on behalf of themselves and a potential class. MediMateh and In-trax purchased and/or leased a modest volume of business telephone products from the manufacturer, Lucent, and its financing affiliate, Newcourt. Plaintiffs’ suit boils down to the claim that defendants misrepresented or concealed Y2K defects in the equipment, and that Lucent refused to repair or replace the telephone…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Webster Salasker Lucas v. Department of Corrections California Men's Colony-WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Deveny v. ENTROPIN, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Lewis Tree Service, Inc. v. Lucent Technologies Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- In re Myford Touch Consumer Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Carideo v. Dell, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2010
- Osterman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.