Legal Opinion

Medimatch, Inc. v. Lucent Technologies Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 24, 2000No. C-99-3198 TEHPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART, DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

HENDERSON, District Judge. INTRODUCTION

This is a consumer fraud action brought by plaintiffs MediMateh Corporation and Intrax Corporation on behalf of themselves and a potential class. MediMateh and In-trax purchased and/or leased a modest volume of business telephone products from the manufacturer, Lucent, and its financing affiliate, Newcourt. Plaintiffs’ suit boils down to the claim that defendants misrepresented or concealed Y2K defects in the equipment, and that Lucent refused to repair or replace the telephone…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Webster Salasker Lucas v. Department of Corrections California Men's Colony-WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Deveny v. ENTROPIN, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Lewis Tree Service, Inc. v. Lucent Technologies Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. In re Myford Touch Consumer Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  4. Carideo v. Dell, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2010
  5. Osterman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API